The last weeks of the year have been packed with plenty of high-profile headlines. Digging beyond them may offer clues into the market environment materializing and how to navigate the new year.


The fiasco at FTX and the belt-tightening in the tech sector may be heralding the end of an era of excess and a newfound focus on the bottom line. Markets may be turning the page on an era of “growth at any cost” and investors may be rewarded for finding a new balance in the year ahead. In this episode of CIO Perspectives, Eric Gordon, Erika Pagel and Sid Ahl analyze recent market developments and discuss how they are positioning portfolios accordingly.

The themes and topics discussed include:

  • How the scandal unfolding at failed crypto exchange FTX may be indicative of the lax diligence and market froth, and whether the tide may be turning after several exuberant years.
  • The outlook for the tech sector, where Elon Musk’s restructuring of Twitter may help set the tone for other companies grappling with high-interest rates and cost structures that could be leaner. After years of runaway hiring, are we headed for a tech reckoning?
  • The macroeconomic backdrop, earnings picture, the strength of the consumer and the outlook for China. We also drill down into the trajectory of inflation and the implications for the balance between growth and value in portfolios this could have.
  • Key investment trends and themes to watch in the new year including biotech, the energy transition and developments in artificial intelligence among others.

As always, we welcome your thoughts, feedback and questions. 

Speakers: Eric Gordon, Erika Pagel and Sid Ahl 


MORE ON THIS TOPIC
CIO Perspectives: Private markets, slowing global growth and are bonds back?

Investors have plenty of challenges to focus on as a volatile year enters its final months. The global growth picture seems to be slowing, corporate earnings may face headwinds and geopolitical tensions seem to be rising. And while we believe private markets continue to be hotbeds of innovation and long-term outperformance, they too face some challenges. In this episode of CIO Perspectives, Keith Stone, Erika Pagel and Sid Ahl discuss some of the most notable market developments in recent weeks and how they are positioning portfolios accordingly. Listen now >



The views and opinions expressed in this podcast are those of the speaker(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of Brown Advisory. These views are not intended to be and should not be relied upon as investment advice and are not intended to be a forecast of future events or a guarantee of future results. The information provided in this podcast is not intended to be and should not be considered a recommendation or suggestion to engage in or refrain from a particular course of action or to make or hold a particular investment or pursue a particular investment strategy, including whether or not to buy, sell, or hold any of the securities mentioned. It should not be assumed that investments in such securities have been or will be profitable.

Any business or tax discussion contained in this communication is not intended as a thorough, in-depth analysis of specific issues. Brown Advisory does not render legal or tax advice.

ESG considerations are one of multiple informational inputs into the investment process, alongside data on traditional financial factors, and so are not the sole driver of decision-making. ESG analysis may not be performed for every holding in every strategy. ESG considerations that are material will vary by investment style, sector/industry, market trends and client objectives. Certain strategies seek to identify companies that Brown Advisory believes may have desirable ESG outcomes, but investors may differ in their views of what constitutes positive or negative ESG outcomes. As a result, certain strategies may invest in companies that do not reflect the beliefs and values of any particular investor. These strategies may also invest in companies that would otherwise be screened out of other ESG oriented funds. Security selection will be impacted by the combined focus on ESG assessments and forecasts of return and risk.

All investments involve risk. The value of the investment and the income from it will vary. There is no guarantee that the initial investment will be returned.

Private equity investments will be characterized by a high degree of risk, volatility and illiquidity due, among other things, to the nature of the investments. A prospective investor should thoroughly review the confidential information contained herein and in the Offering Materials pertaining to any investment, and carefully consider whether such an investment is suitable to the investor's financial situation and goals. Investors should have the financial ability and willingness to accept the risks and lack of liquidity that are characteristic of the investments described in the Memorandum pertaining to an investment opportunity. No assurance can be given that any such opportunity's investment objectives will be achieved or that investors will receive a return of any of their capital. Investors should pay particular attention to the risk factors described in the Memorandum pertaining to an investment opportunity.

ESG considerations are one of multiple informational inputs into the investment process, alongside data on traditional financial factors, and so are not the sole driver of decision-making. ESG analysis may not be performed for every holding in every strategy.

ESG considerations that are material will vary by investment style, sector/industry, market trends and client objectives. Certain strategies seek to identify companies that Brown Advisory believes may have desirable ESG outcomes, but investors may differ in their views of what constitutes positive or negative ESG outcomes. As a result, certain strategies may invest in companies that do not reflect the beliefs and values of any particular investor. These strategies may also invest in companies that would otherwise be screened out of other ESG oriented funds. Security selection will be impacted by the combined focus on ESG assessments and forecasts of return and risk.

Certain Strategies intend to invest in companies with measurable ESG outcomes, as determined by Brown Advisory, and seek to screen out particular companies and industries. Brown Advisory relies on third parties to provide data and screening tools. There is no assurance that this information will be accurate or complete or that it will properly exclude all applicable securities. Investments selected using these tools may perform differently than as forecasted due to the factors incorporated into the screening process, changes from historical trends, and issues in the construction and implementation of the screens (including, but not limited to, software issues and other technological issues). There is no guarantee that Brown Advisory’s use of these tools will result in effective investment decisions.

The S&P 500® Index represents the large-cap segment of the U.S. equity markets and consists of approximately 500 leading companies in leading industries of the U.S. economy. Criteria evaluated include market capitalization, financial viability, liquidity, public float, sector representation and corporate structure. An index constituent must also be considered a U.S. company. Standard & Poor’s, S&P, and S&P 500 are registered trademarks of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC (“S&P”), a subsidiary of S&P Global Inc.

Sectors are based on the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS) sector classification system. The Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS) was developed by and is the exclusive property of MSCI and Standard & Poor’s. “Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS), “GICS” and “GICS Direct” are service marks of Standard & Poor’s and MSCI. “GICS” is a trademark of MSCI and Standard & Poor’s.

Sectors are based on the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS) sector classification system. The Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS) was developed by and is the exclusive property of MSCI and Standard & Poor’s. “Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS), “GICS” and “GICS Direct” are service marks of Standard & Poor’s and MSCI. “GICS” is a trademark of MSCI and Standard & Poor’s.

An investor cannot invest directly into an index.